Scottish builders have raised concerns over a proposed package of reforms to the country's planning system.

In it's response to the Government's 'Places, People and Planning' Position Statement, trade body Homes for Scotland (hfS) said it remains concerned the measures "will be a missed opportunity" to make changes to the system's delivery model, which are required to increase the number of homes across Scotland.

Chief Executive Nicola Barclay said: "Given the crucial role the planning system plays in Scotland's social wellbeing and economic success, the position statement offers a distinct overall lack of detail, particularly in relation to the process for the new Local Development Plan gatecheck and the introduction of an infrastructure levy to address what is becoming the most significant challenge to housing delivery.


"With matters now moving to a Bill at the end of the year, it is our view that a great deal more information is required before the package of legislative and non-legislative reforms can be effectively scrutinised.

"To that end, HFS and its members remain ready to positively engage and assist in developing a clear, robust and effective set of the proposals that meet the housing needs of our growing population."

Elsewhere, Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) Scotland Convenor, Stefano Smith, said while the proposed reforms have the potential to make a positive impact on system, the organisation is worried that "alone they are not enough to have a game-changing impact".

"Without a wider scope that also takes into account the context within which the planning system operates – in particular access to and control over land, resources, and corporate priorities – there is a risk that the review will not result in the delivery of the sustainable development that Scotland needs," he said.

"We also need more clarity on some of the changes the Government envisage, including how to support communities to develop their own plans, how we will plan at a regional level, and how we are going to fund much needed new infrastructure."

(LM/MH)