Pooling resources was deemed a likely option for the future with 91% of respondents saying they would be likely to share services with other organisations. 89% also believe more RSLs will come together through constitutional partnerships and group structures in the short to medium term. The most popular reason given for entering a constitutional arrangement was to help improve services to tenants and other stakeholders.
The results backed up comments made during the conference by keynote speaker Housing Minister, Keith Brown MSP, who encouraged housing organisations to be innovative in delivering services and in developing new houses, in order to maximise available resources. He commented: “The challenges we face at this time are unprecedented and we need new innovative ways of addressing the needs of the people of Scotland.
-- Advertisement --
“Increasing the supply of affordable homes remains a top priority of the Scottish Government. It is a vital part of our efforts to build a fairer Scotland by continuing to address homelessness and affordability issues and regenerating our most deprived neighbourhoods.
“If ever there was a time for working collaboratively on new and innovative ideas, that time is now.
“Despite the severe cuts by the UK Coalition Government, we recognise the role that investment in housing can play in driving economic growth and supporting jobs.
“I welcome the innovation and creativity that is being demonstrated by the housing sector and I urge the industry to continue to develop new models and source alternative sources of funding and, in turn, stimulate our economy.”
Harper Macleod Partner and Head of Public Sector Group, Derek Hogg, said: “Feedback from the conference and the survey results confirm that the housing sector in Scotland recognises the challenges which the current economic environment is throwing up, as well as a willingness to look at new ways of working, including partnership arrangements, in order to continue to provide quality and cost-effective services to tenants and other stakeholders.”
The survey also revealed that 79% of respondents believed a case could be made for paying RSL board members in order to attract people with the necessary skills. In addition, the majority (66%) of people surveyed said ‘no’ when asked if a Registered Social Landlord could only attract a full board containing the necessary skills and experience through elections from the organisation’s membership.
Derek commented: “While it is not for us as lawyers to have a view on whether our clients should or should not pay their board members, it is interesting to note that respondents to the question would prefer to have the option to pay their board members. Certainly you can see that this might be a way to attract necessary specialist skills and experience on to the boards of larger RSLs which increasingly are complex and diverse businesses.”
The twelfth National Housing Conference was attended by more than 120 delegates made up of housing associations, local authorities, developers and funders.
(GK)
